Proposed Pay Structure in the Final Memorandum of NC JCM to 7th CPC
National
Council JCM , Staff Side has finalised its Memorandum to be submitted
to 7th Pay Commission and it has been posted in its website
NCJCMstaffside.com for all central government employees. The Full Final
Memorandum consists 98 pages and the download link is provided below
this post
Chapter —VII
Proposed Pay Structure and Rate of Increment
In
the preceding chapters we have dealt with the various principles of pay
determination as was enunciated by the successive Pay Commissions. The 6
CPC introduced the new concept of Pay Band and Grade Pay. We are not
able to comprehend any logical methodology having been adopted by the
6th CPC in constructing the Pay Band and Grade Pay. In the ultimate
analysis, we found that there had been no uniform multiplication factor.
It varied from 2.2 time to 3. The changes effected by the Government
while implementing the recommendations of the 6th cpc further compounded
the confusion and making t more irrational and arbitrary. The 6 cPC in
their report stated that they have upgraded certain pay scales having
appreciated the contention made by the employees organizations. They
merged certain other pay scales in an effort to delayering the
functions. But the new pay that emerged from such upgradation/merger was
not equivalent to the higher pay scales in the said group. For
instance, the erstwhile pay scales of Rs.5000-8000, 5500-9000 and
6500-10500 were merged. The multiplication factor for pay
band construction was 1.86 times of the minimum. Therefore the pay band
for the pre merged pay scales was determined to begin at Rs.9300/-.
Having merged, the pay band must have begun at 12,090/-, i.e. 1.86 times
of 6500/- in which the other pay scales were merged.
7.2 The
manner in which the Grade pay was devised is also questionable. At the
lower level the Grade Pay progresses @ Rs.100/- ,i.e. 1800, 1900, 2000,
etc. The pay in the Band + Grade Pay at the entry level is 5200 + 1800 =
7000. An employee is entitled for 3% increment every year. He gets a
financial benefit of Rs. 210 every year on account an increment whereas
on promotion his grade pay gets increased by just Rs.100/. only. The
Grade Pay was devised at 40% of the maximum of the pre revised time
scale of pay. The maximum of any time scale of pay will depend upon the
rate of increment and the span of the scale of pay. The ratio between
the minimum and the maximum of all pay scales was not uniform, rather it
could not be uniform. Therefore, prescribing Grade Pay as a percentage
of such variable maximum, in our opinion, was erroneous. Normally
fitment benefit represent the gap between pre revised minimum and
the revised minimum. The 6th CPC recommendation of Grade Pay did not
serve this purpose also. Having been expressed in absolute quantum
amount it gave varied benefit in different pay bands as also at
different stages in the same pay bands.
7.3 The Grade Pay system
brought about various anomalies, which were raised at the NAC but found
no resolution despite discussions on several occasions in the last 6
years. We are of the firm view that the 7” CPC should revert to the Pay
Scale System which has been time tested. We have constructed the pay
scales maintaining the relativities with the time scale of pay suggested
by both 5’ and 6th cPC•
7.4 While constructing the pay scales we
have taken the rate of increments at 5% instead of 3% presently
available. We have done so on the ground that most of the PSUs including
the banking industries provide the incremental rate at 5% and over a
period of time it raises the salary level of the personnel. We therefore
request that the 7th CPC may recommend the rate of annual increment at
5%. Incidentally we may also state that the uniform date of increment
prescribed by the 6th CPC has encountered certain problems and
anomalies. We, therefore, suggest that the 7th cpc may recommend, for
administrative expediency, two specific dates as increment dates, Viz.
1st January and 1st July. Those recruited/appointed/promoted during the
period between l January and 30th June will have their increment date
on 1stt January and those recruited/appointed/promoted between 1st July
and 31st December will have it on 1st July next year. This apart we
request the Commission to specifically recommend that those who retire
on 30th June or 31St December are granted one increment on the last day
of their service.
7.5 We have also felt that a further reduction
in the number of pay scales is needed. While constructing the pay scales
we have removed those pay scales pertaining to Grade Pay of Rs.1900,
2400, 4600, 8700 and the scale of pay of Rs. 75500-80000. We are of the
opinion that the instrument of Special Pay which was in operation
earlier should be brought back to address the need of intermediary
grades in certain organizations. The Associations and
Federations representing the employees and officers of various
departments and various categories will submit their memorandum
indicating the pay scales to be assigned to the categories of the employees and officers they represent taking into account the nature of functions assigned to those categories separately.
7.6
Presently, functional promotion is made to the next hierarchical
position whereas MACP promotion ¡s Grade Pay based, irrespective of the
fact whether a particular Grade Pay exist in the hierarchy or not in the
concerned department. Our suggestion to reduce the number of pay scales
go a great extent to obviate the difficulty encountered due to the dual
system of promotion.
7.7 We have constructed open- ended pay
scales. This is to ensure that no employee stagnates without increment.
The pay of the Secretary and the Cabinet Secretary has been kept as a
fixed amount as has been the recommendation of the 6th CPC. In
consonance with our view on the need for further de-layering, we have
suggested only 14 Pay scales indicating in the table the minimum of each
of them. The said 14 pay scales are given below:
In Table 7.2, the corresponding pay scales of the 6” CPC recommended Grade Pay are given for reference.
Table No. 7.1.
Proposed pay scale minimum.
| Sl. No. | Pay scale No. | Present PB | PB No. | Grade Pay | Proposed minimum of the pay scale. |
| 1 | S.1 | 5200-20200 | PB.1 | 1800 | 26000 |
| 2 | S-2 | 5200-20200 | PB 1 | 2000 | 33000 |
| 3 | S-3 | 5200-20200 | PB 1 | 2800 | 46000 |
| 4 | S-4 | 9300-34800 | PB 2 | 4200 | 56000 |
| 5 | S-5 | 9300-34800 | PB 2 | 4800 | 74000 |
| 6 | S-6 | 9300-34800 | PB 2 | 5400 | 78000 |
| 7 | S-7 | 15600-39100 | PB 3 | 5400 | 88000 |
| 8 | S-8 | 15600-39100 | PB 3 | 6600 | 102000 |
| 9 | S-9 | 15600-39100 | PB 3 | 7600 | 120000 |
| 10 | S-10 | 37400-67000 | PB 4 | 8900 | 148000 |
| 11 | S-11 | 37400-67000 | PB 4 | 10000 | 162000 |
| 12 | S-12 | 75500-80000 | HAG | 0 | 193000 |
| 13 | S-13 | 80000( Fixed ) | Apex scale. | 0 | 213000 |
| 14 | S-14 | 90000 (Fixed) | Cabinet Secy | 0 | 240000 |
Table 7.2.
New Pay scale minimum
| SL.No. | Grade pay of 6thCPC | Minimum of the new pay scale |
| 1 | 1800 | 26000 |
| 2 | 1900 | 31000 |
| 3 | 2000 | 33000 |
| 4 | 2400 | 41000 |
| 5 | 2800 | 46000 |
| 6 | 4200 | 56000 |
| 7 | 4600 | 66000 |
| 8 | 4800 | 74000 |
| 9 | 5400 | 78000 |
| 10 | 5400 in PB3 | 88000 |
| 11 | 6600 | 102000 |
| 12 | 7600 | 120000 |
| 13 | 8700 | 139000 |
| 14 | 8900 | 148000 |
| 15 | 10000 | 162000 |
| 16 | 12000 | 193000 |
| 17 | 75000-80000 | 202000 |
| 18 | 80000 fixed | 213000 |
| 19 | 90000 fixed | 240000 |
Download :
FULL-FINAL-Memorandum of NC JCM
Source : NC JCM Staffside.com