Saturday, June 15, 2013

Rank Pay Matter: Antony expect Attorney General’s opinion on issue of rank pay fixation

Antony seeks AG’s opinion on issue of rank pay fixation
Wants clarification on interpretation of apex court order

Tribune News Service
New Delhi, June 14

Faced with differing interpretations of a Supreme Court order on correct fixation of “rank pay” of armed forces officers, Defence Minister AK Antony today decided to seek opinion of the Attorney General (AG).

The “rank pay” issue is popularly known as the Major AK Dhanapalan case. The Supreme Court, in a verdict last September, ordered fixation of “rank pay” since January 1, 1986, for the Fourth Pay Commission.

Antony, at a high-level meeting today, made it clear that the apex court verdict had to be implemented. The forces and the MoD are in disagreement over interpretation of the SC order. The MoD interpretation is that the order may be implemented for personnel impacted by the Fourth Pay Commission “as on January 1, 1986”. The interpretation of the forces is that it means “with effect from January 1, 1986”.

This would mean that the anomaly in the subsequent pay commissions (the fifth and the sixth) should also be corrected. Rank pay, when calculated with the basic, will enhance pension of thousands of retired officers.

Going by the MoD interpretation, officers affected by the Fourth Pay Commission would benefit, while there would be no hike for those covered under the later pay commissions.

Antony said the Services would give their interpretation and submit to the Attorney General directly while the MoD would take up the matter with the Ministry of Finance that fixed the pays and salaries of all government employees.

According to official sources, Antony wants the matter to be sorted out soon. The MoD will also give its interpretation to the AG.

The Supreme Court had directed the government to re-fix the pay scale of Army officers affected by the Fourth Pay Commission and this would entail an additional burden of Rs 1,600 crore on the exchequer.

The orders benefited officers in the rank of Captain to Brigadier in the Army and equivalent ranks in the Air Force and the Navy, between January 1, 1986, and January 1, 2006.

The apex court also directed the Centre to pay 6 per cent interest from January 1, 2006, to all officers, whether or not they have filed any petition before any of the high courts or the Benches of Armed Forces Tribunal, within 12 weeks from today.

Major AK Dhanapalan was the first officer to challenge the fixation before the Kerala High Court which, in October 1998, directed the government to re-fix the pay without deducting the rank pay.

Read more at: http://www.tribuneindia.com

DOPT Order : Amendment in Reversion Policy for Private Secretary/OSD to Minister

DOPT Order : Amendment in Reversion Policy for Private Secretary/OSD to Minister

F.No.31/15/2011-E0(MM-I)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pension
Department of Personnel & Training

New Delhi, dated 12th June, 2013.

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Amendment in the policy relating to reversion of officers belonging to All India Service as well as Central Services on pre-mature cessation of their tenure as Private Secretary/Officer-on-Special Duty to Ministers.

A review of the policy on the above subject has been under consideration of the Government for some time. The Appointments Committee of the Cabinet (ACC) has now approved certain amendments to the existing policy as mentioned below:-

(i) Officers of all the three All India Services (including IPS) as well as Central Services who are appointed as PS/OSD without completing their "cooling off" should be reverted to their cadre once their term as PS/OSD ends for whatever reason. While appointing such officers as PS/OSD an informed consent should be obtained from them that they are willing to be appointed as PS/OSD in waiver of the "cooling off" requirement, fully aware of the condition that they would be reverted back to their cadre once their term as PS/OSD ends for whatever reason and that they would be further required to complete the "cooling off" afresh;

(ii) Officers of all the three All India Services as well as Central Services who are appointed as PS/OSD from the "Offer List" may be allowed to complete their normal period of central deputation if their term, as PS/OSD ends for whatever reason before the completion of such term.

(iii) Officers of all the three All India Services as well as Central Serviced who are not on the Offer List but are appointed as PS/OSD after completing their "cooling off requirement" should also normally be allowed to complete their full term of Central deputation, subject to their willingness and suitability, in case their term as PS/OSD ends for whatever reason before the completion of such term.

(iv) The revised policy would have a prospective effect and cover all those who:, are appointed as PS/OSD after the date of revision of the policy. Those who are already working as PS/OSD in the Central Government at present as well as those who have already been appointed to posts under the CSS and non-CSS following cessation of their appointment as PS/OSD shall continue to be governed by the pre-revised policy till the completion of their present tenure.

2. All the Ministries/Departments of Government of India, Cadre Controlling Authorities of all participating units under the Central Staffing Scheme and the State Governments are requested to take note of the above revised instructions for information and compliance.

Sd/-
(Dr. Amarpreet Duggal)
Deputy Secretary to the Govt.of India

Source: www.persmin.nic.in/dopt.asp
[http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02eod/31_15_2011-EOMM-I-12062013.pdf]

Friday, June 14, 2013

Arrears & Rank Pay Revision : Example & Table by PCDA

Arrears & Rank Pay Revision : Example & Table by PCDA

Implementation of Hon'ble SC Judgment dated 04/09/2012

How pay has been revised on 1/1/86


A. Existing emoluments as on 1/1/86 ie Basic Pay, DA, ADA, Adhoc DA, Interim Relief I and II are added
B. 20 % of Basic pay is added to it
C. Pay is now fixed at next stage above total emoluments so arrived
Earlier the rank pay was deducted from sum of A and B above before fixing the pay in next above stage. This time Rank Pay has not been deducted.

Example 1
Pay of Capt A in the integrated pay scale (2300 —100 —3900-150-5100) on 1/1/86

Basic Pay 1450
DA/ADA/Adhoc DA1450
IR-I&II215
20% of BP290
Total
3405
 
Earlier pay was fixed at Rs 3300, which is next stage above 3205 (3405 minus 200)
Now Pay fixed at Rs 3500, which is next stage above 3405.

Example 2
Pay of Capt B in the integrated pay scale (2300 -100 -3900-150-5100) on 1/1/86

Basic Pay 1400
DA/ADA/Adhoc DA1450
IR-I&II210
20% of BP280
Total
3340
 
Earlier pay was fixed at Rs 3200, which is next stage above 3140 (3340 minus 200).
Now Pay fixed at Rs 3400, which is next stage above 3340.

Example 3
Pay of Maj C as on 111/86
Basic Pay 1550
DA/ADA/Adhoc DA1470
IR-I&II225
20% of BP310
Total
3555

Earlier pay was fixed at Rs 3400 (minimum prescribed for a Major), despite the fact that the next stage above 2955 ( 3555 minus 600) was 3000.

Now Pay fixed at Rs 3600, which is next stage above 3555.

How arrears have been calculated

Example 1
Capt A - Pay fixed as on 1/1/86 at Rs 3500/-

Date BP DrawnRevised BPRank Pay
1/1/86Pay Revision33003500200
1/12/86INCR34003600200
05/12/87Prom to Masi3400 *3600*600
1/12/87INCR35003700600
1/12/88INCR36003800600
1/12/89INCR37003900600
1/12/90INCR38004050600
1/12/91INCR39004200600
1/12/92INCR40504350600
1/12/93INCR42004500600
1/12/94INCR43504650600
06/12/94Prom to Lt Col4350*4650*800
1/12/95INCR45004800800
1/1196INCR13900143001600
1112/96INCR14300147001600
1/12/97INCR14700151001600
1/05/98Prom to Col1510015100$2000

* Minimum Pay prescribed for the ranks of Maj and Lt Col was Rs 3400/- and Rs 3900/- respectively. Officer already in receipt of same or more pay on the date of promotion, therefore Basic Pay didn't change on these dates.

5th CPC Orders - At the time of promotion, Basic Pay is fixed in the pay scale of higher rank and Rank Pay of higher rank is admitted.

Pay scale of Lt Col 13500 - 400 - 17100
Pay scale of Col 15100 - 450 - 17350

As the starting pay in the scale for Col was 15100, no change in Pay on the date of promotion.
In this case arrears will accrue from 01/01/86 till 01/05/98 only, as the pay drawn and pay due is same after 01/05/98.

Example 2
Capt B - Pay fixed as on 1/1/86 at Rs3400/-

Date BP DrawnBP dueRankPay
1/1/86Revised Pay32003400200
1/08/86INCR33003500200
1/08/87INCR34003600200
20/04/88Prom to Maj3400*3600*600
1/08/88INCR35003700600
1/08/89INCR36003800600
1/08/901NCR37003900600
1/08/91INCR38004050600
1/08/921NCR39004200600
1/08/93INCR40504350600
1/08/94INCR42004500600
18/06/95Prom to Lt Col4200*4500*800
1/0895INCR43504650800
1/1/96INCR13900$1390051600

*  Minimum Pay prescribed for the ranks of Maj and Lt Col was Rs 3400/- and Rs 3900/- respectively, Officer already in receipt of same or more pay on the date of promotion, therefore Basic Pay didn't change on these dates.
As per 5th CPC Pay fixation Charts, BP of Lt Cols drawing Basic Pay Rs 4350, 4500 and 4650 gets bunched at Rs 13900.
In this ease an-ears will accrue from 01/01/86 to 01/01/96 only, as the pay drawn and pay due is same from 01/01/96.

Example 3
Maj C - Pay fixed as on 1/1/86 at Rs3600/

Date BP DrawnBP dueRank Pay
1/1/86Revised Pay34003600600
1/12/86INCR35003700600
1/12/87INCR36003800600
1/12/88INCR37003900600
1/12/89INCR38004050600
1/12/90INCR39004200600
1/12/91INCR40504350600
1/12/92INCR42004500600
16/08/93Prom to Lt Col42004500800
1/12/93INCR43504650800
1/12/94INCR45004800800
1/12/95INCR46504950800
1/1/96Pay Fixation 5CPC13900143001600
05/05/96Prom to Col15100 $15100 $ 2000

As per 5th CPC Pay fixation Charts, BP of Lt Cols drawing Basic Pay Rs 4350, 4500 and 4650 gets bunched at Rs 13900.

In this case arrears will accrue from 01/01/86 to 05/05/96 only, as the pay drawn and pay due is same from 01/01/96.

Source: https://pcdaopune.gov.in
[https://pcdaopune.gov.in/Downloads/HOWPAYREV.PDF]

Constitution of the Committee for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years and upto 64 years of age - Dopt order

Constitution of the Committee for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years and upto 64 years of age - Dopt order

Dopt issued an order regarding constitution of a Screening Committee for considering proposals for extension in service of Specialists in Scientific and Medical fields beyond the age of 62 years.

No. 26012/12/2013-Estt.(A) 
Government of India 
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions 
Department of Personnel & Training

New Delhi, dated the 13th June, 2013


OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject :- Constitution of the Committee for extension of service of Scientists beyond 62 years and upto 64 years of age.

The undersigned is directed to say that the Prime Minister has approved the composition of the Screening Committee for considering proposals for extension in service of Specialists in Scientific and Medical fields beyond the age of 62 years as under

(i) Cabinet SecretaryChairman
(ii) Secretary, Department of Science & TechnologyMember
(iii) Secretary, Department of Bio-technologyMember
(iv) Secretary, Department of Personnel & TrainingMember

2. The tenure of the Committee will be two years.

3. In the case of officials belonging to mission oriented Agencies like the Department of Atomic Energy or the Department of Space, the Secretary of the Department concerned will also be associated with the Committee.

sd/-
(B.Bandyopadhyay)
Under Secretary

1. Secretary,
Department of Atomic Energy, Anushakti Bhawan,
Chhatrapati Shivaji Maharaj Marg,
Mumbai-400001.

2. Secretary,
Department of Space,
Antariksh Bhawan, New B.E.L. Road,
Bangalore-560231.

3. Secretary,
Ministry of Environment & Forests,
9th Floor, Paryavaran Bhawan,
CGO Complex, Lodi Road,
New Delhi-110003.

4. Secretary,
Ministry of Earth Sciences,
Prithvi Bhavan, IMD Campus,
Lodi Road,
New Delhi-110003.

5. Secretary,
Department of Science & Technology,
Technology Ohawan,
New Mehrauli Road,
New Delhi 110016.

6. Secretary,
Department of Defence Research & Development,
DRDO Bhawan, New Delhi.

7. Secretary,
Department of Bio-Technology,
Block 2, 7th Floor, CGO Complex,
New Delhi.

8. Secretary,
Department of Scientific & Industrial Research,
Anusandhan Bhawan, 2, Rafi Marg,
New Delhi-110001.

9. Secretary,
Department of Information & Technology,
Electronics Niketan,
6, CGO Complex,
New Delhi-110003.

Source: www.persmin..nic.in
[http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02est/26012_12_2013-Estt.A-13062013.pdf]

Granting of Financial Upgradation under MACP Scheme - Clarification reg.

Granting of Financial Upgradation under MACP Scheme - Clarification reg.

Southern Railway issued a clarification order on MACP Scheme regarding the terms used "In same Grade Pay" and "Normal Promotion".

SOUTHERN RAILWAY
No.P(R)535/P/MACPS/Vol.III
Headquarters Office
Personnel Branch
Chennai – 600003
Dated: 20-05-2013
PBC No: 54/2013

All PHODs / DRMs / CWMs / CEWE / CAO / CPM / Dy.CPOs / Sr.DPOs / DPOs / SPOs / WPOs / APOs if HQ / Dvisions / Workshops / other Units, etc., (As per mailing list – ‘A’)

Sub: Granting of Financial Upgradation under MACP Scheme — Clarification reg.

Ref : Railway Board’s letter No. PC-V/2009/ACP/2 dated 13-12-2012 (RBE No. 142 / 2012, PBC No. 189 / 2012).

Consequent to issue of Railway Board’s letter dated 13-12-2012 (RBE No. 142 / 2012), many doubts have been raised from various quarters as to how the the clarification given is to be followed.

In terms of the above cited letter, an employee holding feeder post in a cadre where promotional post is in the same Grade Pay, financial upgradation under ACP / MACP scheme cannot be to a higher Grade Pay than what can be allowed to an employee on his normal promotion and would be granted the same Grade Pay. The doubts were with regard to the terms used i.e., "In same Grade Pay" and "Normal Promotion".

As clarified by Board, the following clarifications are given citing certain examples :

(a)A Sr. Clerk on direct recruitment with GP Rs. 2800/- having earned two promotions to GP Rs. 4200/- and Rs.4600/- is entitled to be considered for 3rd Financial Upgradation to GP Rs. 4800/- under MACP Scheme subject to fulfilling other terms and conditions relating to the scheme.

(b)A Technical supervisor on direct recruitment with GP Rs. 4200/- having earned one promotion to GP Rs. 4600/- is entitled to be considered for grant of 2nd and 3rd Financial Upgradation to GP Rs. 4800/- and GP Rs. 5400/- of PB 2 respectively under MACP Scheme subject to fulfilment of terms and conditions relating to the scheme.

(c)A Sr.Section Engineer on direct recruitment with GP Rs. 4600/- is entitled to be considered for grant of 1st, 2nd & 3rd Financial Upgradation to GP Rs. 4800/- in PB 2, GP Rs. 5400/- in PB-2, and GP Rs. 5400/- in PB-3 respectively under MACP Scheme subject to fulfilment of terms and conditions relating to the scheme.

(d) A Chief Matron with GP Rs. 5400/- in PB-2 is entitled to be considered for Financial Upgradation under MACPS to the same GP Rs. 5400/- in PB-3, as per terms contained in Para 8.1 of Annexure to Board’s letter dt. 10-06-2009 (RBE No. 101 /2009, PBC No. 112/2009)

(e) A Staff Nurse directly recruited with GP Rs. 4600/- is entitled to be considered for 3rd Financial Upgradation under MACP scheme to GP of Rs. 5400/- in PB-3 after earning two Promotion / Financial Upgradation to GP Rs. 4800/- and Rs. 5400/- in PB-2, subject to fulfilment of terms and conditions relating to the scheme.

It has been further clarified that 3 % increment as Pay Fixation in respect of employees who are granted Financial Upgradation to the same Grade Pay is to be allowed or not, (since as per RS(PR) Rules 2008 it is still not allowed) is under consideration in consultation with Ministry of Finance. Hence, for example a Sr. Technician on promotion / Financial Upgradation granted same Grade Pay, or when Goods Driver promoted / granted Financial Upgradation under MACP to the same Grade Pay of Rs. 4200/-, the pay fixation is under consideration and yet to be clarified.

The cases decided otherwise than as clarified above may be reviewed and action taken accordingly.

This is issued with the approval of CPO/MAS.

sd/-
(M.SRINIVASALU)
Asst. Personnel Officer / Rules
for Chief Personnel Officer


Source: www.irtsa.net
[http://www.irtsa.net/pdfdocs/Clarification_from_CPO_SR_Reg_MACP_to_JE_and_SSE.pdf]

Combinations of different posts for creation of post of OSD, Addl. PS and Asstt.PS in the personal staff of Ministers

Combinations of different posts for creation of post of OSD, Addl. PS and Asstt.PS in the personal staff of Ministers

No.8/56/2011-CS-II(C)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training

Lok Nayak Bhawan,
Khan Market, New Delhi-110 003
Dated: the 12th June, 2013

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Combinations of different posts for creation of post of OSD, Addl. PS and Asstt.PS in the personal staff of Ministers — regarding.

The undersigned is directed to refer to this Deptt's O.M. No,8/3/92-CS-II dated 14.1.1994 wherein instructions have been issued by this Department from time to time indicating the scale of personal staff admissible to Union Council of Ministers and related matters.

2. For easy reference, a detailed list containing various combinations of posts to be surrendered for creation of posts of OSD, Addl. PS and Asstt. PS in the personal staff of Union Council of Ministers is given below:-

OSD
(PB-4 (Rs.37400-67000)+
8700(GP)
i) Two posts of Addl.PS;
ii) Addl.PS + Asstt.PS;
iii) Addl.PS + 1st PA;
iv) Addl.PS + 2nd PA + 1 Attendant;
v) Addl.PS + Hindi PA + Peon;
vi) 1st PA + Hindi PA + LDC + Peon;
vii) 2nd PA + Hindi PA + LDC + Peon
OSD
(PB-3 (Rs.15600-39100)+
7600(GP)
i) AddLPS + Asstt.PS
ii) Add l.PS + 1st PA
iii) Addl.PS + Peon
iv) Asstt.PS + Peon
v) 2nd PA + Peon
vi) LDC + 2 Peons
vii) LDC + Attendant + Peon
viii) Attendant + 2 Peon
Addl.PS
(PB-3 (Rs.15600-39100)+
6600(GP)
i) Asstt.PS + LDC
ii) Asstt.PS + 1st PA
iii) Asstt.PS + Attendant
iv) Asstt.PS + Peon
v) 1st PA + LDC
Vi) 1st PA + Attendant
vii) 1st PA + Peon
viii) 2nd PA + LDC
ix) 2nd PA + Attendant
X) 2nd PA + Peon
Asstt.PS
(PB-2 (Rs.9300-34800)+
4800(GP)
i) 2 PA + Hindi PA
ii) 2nd PA + LDC
iii) 2nd — . +
FA Attendant
iv) 2nd PA + Peon
v) Hindi PA +LDC
vi) Hindi PA +Attendant
vii) Hindi PA + Peon
viii) Attendant + Peon
ix) Two posts of Peons
Note: The pay scales of different posts in the personal staff of Union Council of Ministers are given in this Deptt's 0.M. No.8/30/2010-CS-II(C) dated 19.08.2010.

3. It is also brought to the notice that in terms of this Department's 0.M. dated 14.1.1994, Ministries/Departments have also been advised to ensure that as far as possible, the lower level posts including the posts meant for stenographers service are not surrendered for providing matching savings for creation of additional posts in excess of entitlement.

4. All the Ministries/Departments are requested to keep in view the above facts before forwarding any proposal for creation of posts of OSD, Addl. PS and Asstt,PS in the personal staff of Union Council of Ministers by means of surrendering of posts within the scale of entitlement of the personal staff of the concerned Minister.

Sd/-
(Vandana Sharma)
Director (CS-II)
Source: www.persmin.nic.in
[http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02csd/8562013.pdf]

Thursday, June 13, 2013

Directorate of Pension: Government of Tamil Nadu: Dearness Allowance

Dearness Allowance: Directorate of Pension: Government of Tamil Nadu

Government of Tamil Nadu
Directorate of Pension
Dearness Allowance
3.1    According to Pension rule 50.A, the pensioners and the family pensioners are granted Dearness Allowance against the price rise.
During the reemployment under Central or State Government or Government undertaking or Autonomous body or Local Body, they are not eligible to draw D.A., in case D.A. is allowed in addition to fixed pay or time scale. In other cases of reemployment D.A. is allowed subject to the limit of emoluments last drawn. D.A. is not allowed while the pensioner stays abroad and also in case of employees absorbed in public undertaking or bodies. If the pensioner stayed abroad without reemployment, he shall be eligible to draw D.A. on pension.  (G.O. 902 Fin 26.11.1992, 795 Fin 12.10.1995,191 Fin 16.03.1996, letter 87769 /pen/ 95-11 fin 23.2.1998).



3.2   The Rates of Dearness Allowance

Prior to 1972 there was no element of D.A. on Pension.  From 01.04.1972 there was a flat rate of D.A. to all the pensioners 01.04.1972 @ Rs.5 ; 01.04.1973  @ Rs.10 ;  01.10.1973 @ Rs.15 ; 01.04.1974 @ Rs.20 ; 01.02.1975 @ Rs.28 ; 01.02.1976 @ RS.32 ; 01.04.1977 10 % subject to maximum of Rs.15 15.09.1977 Rs.10 for those retired prior to 01.06.1961and Rs.5 after 01.06.1961 ; 01.04.1978  5% increase  -  minimum Rs.10, maximum Rs.25. From  01.04.1979 to 30.09.1984 there were 28 installments of D.A. paid to the pensioners at certain fixed rates for 13 slabs of pension amounts. From 01.10.1984 to date, the pensioners are paid D.A. at certain percentage of basic pension. The different rates at different points of time D.A. are given in Annexure on D.A. Tables.

3.3    Dearness Allowance is calculated on the original pension without commutation.

3.4    Dearness Allowance is granted at certain percentage of basic pension and it is revised every 6 months from 01.07.1986 onwards based on cost of living index.

Wednesday, June 12, 2013

Railway Board - Recommendations of Sixth CPC - MACP Scheme regarding

Railway Board - Recommendations of Sixth CPC - MACP Scheme regarding

Railway Board has given as reply to NFIR regarding that the clarification on promotion under MACP to Draftsman in Railways. The letter is reproduced and given below for your ready reference...

GOVERNMENT OF INDIA
MINISTRY OF RAILWAYS
(RAILWAY BOARD)
No.PC-V/2011/M/4/NFIR
New Dlehi, dated 10.06.2013

The General Secretary
NFIR
3, Chelmsford Road,
New Delhi - 110055

Sub:-Recommendations of 6th CPC-MACP Scheme regarding.

The undersigned is directed to refer to NFIR’s letter No. IV/MACPS/09/Pt-6, dated 23/05/2013 and to state that the matter has been examined in consultation with DoP&T, the nodal Department of Government on MACP Scheme has been clarified that the incumbents of the lower post CANNOT be treated as initially appointed in the upgraded post just because the two lower rungs of the promotional hierarchy have been abolished under two consecutive cadre restructuring. In fact, it is the post which are upgraded.  The incumbent’s appointment to the upgraded post is by way of promotion only.

Accordingly, the employees who had joined the post of Tracers on direct recruitment basis with matric as recruitment qualification for the post, have already earned two promotions by reaching Sr. Draftsman post (re-designated as JE-II), first promotion as Assistant Draftsman and 2nd promotion as Senior Draftsman / JE-II, either in normal course or as a result of Board's instructions dated 25-06-1985 and 28.09.1998 respectively. Thus such employees are entitled for 3rd financial upgradation only subject to fulfilment of other terms and conditions as related therewith, provided that they have not earned any further promotions.

Yours faithfully,
sd/-
for Secretary/ Railway Board

Source : NFIR

DOPT Order - Representation from Government employee on service matters

No.11013/08/2013-Estt.(A)-III
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training

North Block, New Delhi
Dated the 6th June, 2013

OFFICE MEMORANDUM

Subject: Representation from Government servant on service matters.

The undersigned is directed to refer to the Ministry of Home Affair’s O.M No.118/52-Ests. dated the 30th April, 1952, O.M No. 25/34/68-Estt.(A) dated the 20th December, 1968 and this Department’s O.M No.11013/07/1999-Estt.(A) dated the 1st November, 1999 (copies enclosed for ready reference) on the above mentioned subject. This Department is receiving a number of representations, on service matters, addressed to the Prime Minister / Minister / Secretary (P) and other officers directly from the Government servants.

2. It has been envisaged in these instructions that whenever, in any matter connected with his service rights or conditions, a Government servant wishes to press a claim or to seek redress of a grievance, the proper course for him is to address his immediate official superior, or the Head of his office, or such other authority at the lowest level as is competent to deal with the matter. Of late, it is observed that there is an increasing tendency on the part of officers at different levels to by-pass the prescribed channels of representation and write directly to the high functionaries totally ignoring the prescribed channels. The problem is more acute in large Departments where often very junior employees at clerical level address multiple representations to the Minster, Prime Minister and other functionaries. Apart from individual representations, the service unions have also developed a tendency to write to the Ministers and Prime Minister on individual grievance. Some of these representations are often forwarded through Members of Parliament, in violation of Rule 20 of the CCS (Conduct) Rule, 1964.

3. Existing instructions clearly provide that representations on service matters should be forwarded through proper channel. The stage at which an advance copy of the representation may be sent to higher authorities has also been indicated. In MHA O.M. No. 25/34/68-Estt.(A) dated 20.12.68 time limits for disposal of various types of representations have been prescribed. If it is anticipated that an appeal or petition cannot be disposed of within a month of its submission, an acknowledgement or interim reply should be sent to the individual within a month.

4. Thus adequate instructions are available in the matter of submission of representations by the Government servants and treatment of the representations by the authorities concerned. As such submission of representations directly to higher authorities by- passing the prescribed channel of communication, has to be viewed seriously and appropriate disciplinary action should be taken against those who violate these instructions as it can rightly be treated as an unbecoming conduct attracting the provisions of Rule 3 (1) (iii) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules. 1964.

5. It is again reiterated that these instructions may be brought to the notice of all Govt. servants and appropriate disciplinary action may be taken against those who violate these instructions.

sd/-
Y.K.Wadhwa)
Under Secretary to the Government of India

Copy of the Office Memorandum No.118/52-Ests. Dated 30th April, 1952

Representations from Government Servants on service matters — advance copies.

Reference are frequently received in this Ministry enquiring whether the submission of advance copies of representations to higher authorities is permissible and as to the treatment that should be accorded to such copies. The matter has been carefully considered and the following instructions are issued for the guidance of al concerned

2. Whenever, in any matter connected with his service rights or conditions, a Government servant wishes to press a claim or to seek redress of a grievance, the proper course for him is to address his immediate superior official, or the Head of office, or such other authority at the lowest level as he is competent to deal with the matter. An appeal or representation to a higher authority must not be made unless the appropriate lower authority has already rejected the claim or refused relief or ignored or unduly delayed the disposal of the case. Representations to still higher authorities (.e.g. those addressed to the President, the Government or to Hon’ble Minister) must be submitted through the proper channel (i.e, the Head of Office, etc. concerned). There will be no objection at that stage, but only at that stage to an advance copy of the representation being sent direct.

3. The treatment by the higher authorities of advance copies of representations so received should be governed by the following general principles —

(a) If the advance copy does not clearly show that all means of securing attention or redress from lower authorities have been duly tried and exhausted, the representation should be ignored or rejected summarily on that ground, the reasons being communicated briefly to the Government servants. If the Government servant persists in this prematurely addressing the higher authorities, suitable disciplinary action should be taken against him.

(b) If the advance copy shows clearly that all appropriate lower authorities have been duly addressed and exhausted, it should be examined to ascertain whether on the facts as stated, some grounds for interference or for further consideration, prima facie exist. Where no such grounds appear, the representation may be ignored or summarily rejected , the reasons being communicated briefly to the Government servant.

(C) Even where some grounds for interference or further consideration appear to exist, the appropriate lower authority should be asked. within a reasonable time, to forward the original representation, with its report and comments on the points urged. There is ordinarily no justification for the passing of any orders on any representation without thus ascertaining the comments of the appropriate lower authority.

4. Some Government servants are in the habit of sending copies of their representations also to outside authorities, i.e. authorities who are not directly concerned with the consideration thereof (e.g. other Honorable Minister, Secretary, Members of Parliament, etc). This is a most objectionable practice, contrary to official propriety and subversive of good discipline and all Government servants are expected scrupulously to eschew it.

Copy of the Office Memorandum No. 25/34/68-Estt.(A) Dated 20.12.1968

Representations from Government servants on service matters — Treatment of

Reference is invited to the Ministry of Home Affairs Office Memorandum No.118/52-Ests. Dated the 30th April, 1952 on the subject mentioned above (copy enclosed for ready reference). It has been brought to the notice of the Ministry of Home Affairs that undue delay occurs very often in the disposal of representations from Government servants in regard to matters connected with the service rights or conditions which causes hardship to the individuals concerned.

2. The representations from Government servants on service matters may be broadly classified as follows :-

(1) Representations/complaints regarding non-payment of salary/allowances or othe dues.

(2) Representations on other service matters,

(3) Representations against the orders of the immediate superior authority: and

(4) Appeals and petitions under statutory rules and orders (e.g. Classification Control and Appeal Rules and the petition Instructions).

3. In regard to representations of the type mentioned at (1) and (2) above, if the individual has not received a reply thereto within a month of its submission, he could address, or ask for an interview with the next higher officer for redress of his grievances. Such superior officer should immediately send for the papers and take such action as may be called for, without delay.

4. Representations of the type mentioned at (3) above, would be made generally only in cases where there is no provision under the statutory rules or orders for making appeals or petitions. Such representations also should be dealt with as expeditiously as possible. ‘The provisions of the preceding paragraph would apply to such representations also, but not to Later representations made by the same Government servant on the same subject after his earlier representation has been disposed off appropriately.

5. In regard to the representations of the type mentioned at (4) above, although the relevant rules or orders do not prescribe a time limit for disposing of appeals and petitions by the competent authority, it should be ensured that all such appeals and petitions receive prompt attention and are disposed within a reasonable time. If it is anticipated that an appeal or a petition cannot be disposed of within a month of its submission, an acknowledgement or an interim reply should be sent to the individual within a month.

6. The instructions contained in paragraph 2 of this Ministry’s Office Memorandum No.118/52-Ests. Dated the 30th April, 1952, will stand modified to the extent indicated in the paragraphs 3, 4 and 5 above.
No.11013/7/99-Estt.(A)
Government of India
Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances & Pensions
Department of Personnel & Training

New Delhi, dated the 1st November, 1999

OFFICE MEMORANDUM
Subject: Representation from Government Servants on Service matters.

The undersigned is directed to  refer to the Ministry of Home Affairs O.M.No.118/52-Ests. dated 30th April, 1952 on the subject mentioned above (copy enclosed for ready reference).

2. It has been envisaged in these instructions that whenever, in any matter connected with his service rights or conditions, a Government servant wishes to press a claim or to seek redress of a grievance, the proper course for him is to address his immediate official superior, or the Head of Office, or such other authority at the lowest level as he is competnet to deal with the matter. Of late, it is observed that there has been a tendency on the part of officers at differnet levels to by-pass the prescribed channels of representation and write directly to the high functionaries totally ignoring the prescribed channels. The problem is more acute in large Departments where often very Junior employees at clerical level address multiple representations to the Minister, Prime Minister and other functionaries. Apart from individual representations, the service unions have also developed a tendency to write to the Ministers and Prime Minister on individual grievances. Some of these representations are often forwarded through Members of Parliament, in violation of Rule 20 of the CCS (Conduct) Rule, 1964.

3. Existing instructions clearly provide that representations on service matters should be forwarded through proper channel. The stage at which an advance copy of the representation may be sent to higher authorities has also been indicated. In MHA O.M. No. 25/34/68-Estt.(A) dated 20.12.68 (copy enclosed) time limits for disposal of various types of representations have been prescribed. If it is anticipated that an appeal or petition cannot be disposed of within a month of its submission, an acknowledgement or interim reply should be sent to the individual within a month.

4. Thus adequate instructions are available in the matter of submission of representations by the Government servants and treatment of the representations by the authorities concerned. As such submission of representations directly to higher authorities by- passing the prescribed channel of communication, has to be viewed seriously and appropriate disciplinary action should be taken against those who violate these instructions as it can rightly be treated as an unbecoming conduct attracting the provisions of Rule 3 (1) (iii) of the CCS (Conduct) Rules. 1964.

5. It is again reiterated that these instructions may be brought to the notice of all Govt. servants and appropriate disciplinary action may be taken against those who violate these instructions.
sd/-
(T.O.Thomas)
Deputy Secretary to the Government of India

Source: www.pesrmin.nic.in
[http://ccis.nic.in/WriteReadData/CircularPortal/D2/D02est/11013_08_2013-Estt-A-III.pdf]

Proposal forwarded to PMO by DOPT - CG employees to retire at 62

Proposal forwarded to PMO by DOPT - CG employees to retire at 62

"A move is afoot to raise the retirement age of over five million central government employees from 60 to 62 years" "The Ministry of Personnel and Training has forwarded a proposal in this regard to the Prime Minister's office (PMO) for inclusion in the agenda of the Cabinet for consideration, after securing consent of various ministries, sources said, claiming that it has an approval of the finance ministry. The decision will help immensely those on the verge of retirement to continue in service for two years."

The above texts are the part of News Item Published by Goa Based English News Paper OHeraldO the full text of the news article is reproduced below.  Earlier same news was published by Financial express that enhancement in Retirement Age from 60 to 62 years, an in-principal Decision has been taken by DoPT:-

Central workers to retire at 62? - TEAM HERALD
June 11, 2013

NEW DELHI: A move is afoot to raise the retirement age of over five million central government employees from 60 to 62 years, citing the longer span of life enabling most to be fit to work, though ostensibly it may be keeping an eye on the Delhi Assembly elections due in November to influence over 80 per cent of them living in the capital.

The Ministry of Personnel and Training has forwarded a proposal in this regard to the Prime Minister's office (PMO) for inclusion in the agenda of the Cabinet for consideration, after securing consent of various ministries, sources said, claiming that it has an approval of the finance ministry. The decision will help immensely those on the verge of retirement to continue in service for two years.

The High Court judges already enjoy tenure up to 62 while the retirement age of the Supreme Court judges and the Election Commissioners is 65. The retirement age has also been raised to 62 in case of some key posts. It is already 62 years in case of the employees of the Madhya Pradesh government.
This will be the third time that the retirement age of the central staff is being raised and it is bound to have the cascading effect on the states coming under pressure from the employees' associations to follow suit.
It was raised from 55 to 58 by then Prime Minister Jawaharlal Nehru in 1962 after the war with China and then to 60 years by the then NDA government in 1998 on the recommendation of the central pay commission.

The central staff is already quite happy with the government for getting as much as 80 per cent of the basic pay as the dearness allowance, thanks to the last hike of 8 per cent announced in April with retrospective effect from January 1. Just before the polls, they may get yet another DA hike as the pay commission recommendation accepted by the government mandates revision twice a year to match the rise or fall in the consumer price index of the industrial workers.

Read more at: http://oheraldo.in/

Now Trending

34% DA Order for Central Govt Employees wef 01.01.2022 - Latest CG Employees DA Order Jan 2022

 DA Order for Central Government Employees from Jan 2022 - Finmin Order 2022 Latest CG Employees DA Order Jan 2022 Dearness Allowance payabl...

Disclaimer:

All efforts have been made to ensure accuracy of the content on this blog, the same should not be construed as a statement of law or used for any legal purposes. Our blog "Central Government Staff news" accepts no responsibility in relation to the accuracy, completeness, usefulness or otherwise, of the contents. Users are advised to verify/check any information with the relevant department(s) and/or other source(s), and to obtain any appropriate professional advice before acting on the information provided in the blog.

Links to other websites that have been included on this blog are provided for public convenience only.

The blog "Central Government Staff news" is not responsible for the contents or reliability of linked websites and does not necessarily endorse the view expressed within them. We cannot guarantee the availability of such linked pages at all times.

Any suggestions write to us
centralgovernmentnews@gmail.com