MACP Scheme – treatment of employees appointed through
LDCE/GDCE against Promotee Quota vacancies at par with those selected
against DR/LDCE quota vacancies —reg.
NFIR General Secretary Shri.M.Raghavaiah has written to Railway
Board regarding that one more anomaly has been created in MACP Scheme,
when implemented to the employees appointed through LDCE/GDCE against
promotee quota vacancies at par with those selected against DR/LDCE
quota vacancies…
We have reproduced the full content of the letter and given below for your information:
NFIR
National Federation of Indian Railwaymen
(Affiliated to Indian National Trade Union Congress)
No.IV/MACPS/09/Pt.6
Dated 19.11.2012
The Secretary (E),
Railway Board,
NEW DELHI
Dear Sir,
Sub: MACP Scheme – treatment of employees appointed through
LDCE/GDCE against Promotee Quota vacancies at par with those selected
against DR/LDCE quota vacancies —reg.
Ref: Railway Bord’s letter No.PC-V/2009/ACP/2 dated 12/09/2012.
NFIR wishes to invite attention of the Railway Board to yet another
anomaly that has been created causing resentment among staff as a
result of issuance of letter under reference. In this connection, NFIR
furnishes following illustration for rectification and issuing
justified instructions: -
2. ‘A’ has joined as SCP in Traffic Dept in the year 1997. He
appeared for the selection to the post of ASM through LDCE against PRQ
and got posted as ASM in the year 2000. Another employee ‘B’ has joined
as Helper in C & W Cadre in the year 1998. He appeared for the
selection to the post of ASM through GDCE against DR quota and got
posted as ASM during the year 2002.
‘A’ will be getting his II MACP in the year 2010 to Grade Pay Rs.4200/-
‘B’ will be getting his I MACP in the year 2012 to Grade Pay Rs.4200/-
‘A’ will be getting his III MACP in the year 2020 to Grade Pay Rs.4600/-
‘B’ will be getting his II MACP in the year 2022 to Grade Pay Rs.4600/-
‘A’ will not be getting MACP to Grade Pay Rs.4800/-
But ‘B’ will be getting his III MACP in the year 2032 to Grade Pay Rs.4800.
3. Here an employee entered Railway service later and got selected
as ASM later will be getting higher Grade Pay than another employee who
entered in Railway service earlier and got selected as ASM earlier. This
will constitute a serious anomaly and lead to injustice to the seniors.
Keeping in view the situation as highlighted above which Railway
employees will be encountering quite frequently, the NFIR, therefore,
urges the Railway Board to issue suitable clarificatory instructions so
that Railway employees who happened to be senior do not face unnecessary
hardships. A copy of the instructions issued may be endorsed to the
NFIR.
Yours faithfully,
sd/-
(M.Raghavaiah)
General Secretary
0 comments:
Post a Comment